The Death of ESG: Why Taxonomy Reporting Is Taking Over
ESG: A Promising Idea That Lost the Plot
An oil company with a “sustainable” rating. A tobacco giant on an ESG leaders list. Tesla dropped from an index while oil refiners stayed in. These are real-world examples of how ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) scoring systems have produced confusing — and sometimes contradictory — results.
Why? ESG ratings are based on inconsistent, often opaque methodologies. They’re not standardized, and they rarely align on what actually counts as sustainable. What started as a well-intentioned framework turned into a fragmented, gamified system that rewards process over substance — and often overlooks a company’s real-world impact.
Commissioner Mairead McGuinness introducing the EU Taxonomy – a regulatory step forward toward science-based sustainability standards.
Source: European Commission.
Taxonomy to the Rescue: Science, Law, and Clarity
The EU Taxonomy offers a radical alternative: a regulated, science-based classification system that defines what counts as environmentally sustainable — by law. Instead of composite scores, companies disclose what percentage of their revenue is taxonomy-aligned. These disclosures must be verifiable and follow strict technical screening criteria.
Crucially, the EU Taxonomy also includes Minimum Social Safeguards, ensuring companies respect basic labor and human rights standards. Sustainability isn’t just about emissions or water usage — it’s also about how people are treated along the way.
From Theory to Practice: The SWISOX Traffic Light System™
At SWISOX, we built our Traffic Light System™ on this foundation. We’re not replacing the taxonomy — we’re simply making it usable. Our role is to translate what companies already report into a format that’s clear, accessible, and actionable.
Our Green Light List highlights companies that meet the highest taxonomy-aligned standards. In the coming months, we’ll expand with Amber (credible transition) and Red (non-compliant) classifications.
This isn’t a new label. It’s a reality check — based on data, not branding.
A Global Shift Toward Accountability
Over 50 countries are now developing their own taxonomies. Why? Because the ESG era taught us something important: if “sustainable” means everything, it means nothing. Regulators are recognizing that clear, science-based definitions are essential to channel capital toward real impact.
It’s not about scrapping ESG entirely. It’s about evolving past ESG 1.0 — inconsistent and subjective — and into ESG 2.0, where sustainability is defined by law, measured by data, and traceable by design.
🧠 Read the Full Newsletter
📬 The Death of ESG: Taxonomy Takes Over — Full version on Substack →
